I wasn’t aware of this discussion about Chainanalysis in 2013. Might be interesting to revisit:
- [47] K. Torpey. Someone may be deanonymizing your bitcoin transactions. URL: http://insidebitcoins.com/news/someone-may-be-deanonymizing-your-bitcoin-transactions/30759, last checked on 13-03-2015. (archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20150711073038/http://insidebitcoins.com/news/someone-may-be-deanonymizing-your-bitcoin-transactions/30759)
- [9] G. Caffyn. Chainalysis ceo denies ’sybil attack’ on bitcoin’s network. URL: http://www.coindesk.com/chainalysis-ceo-denies-launching-sybil-attack-on-bitcoin-network/, last checked on 14-03-2015. (archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160611220409/http://www.coindesk.com/chainalysis-ceo-denies-launching-sybil-attack-on-bitcoin-network/)
In the same context, the paper referenced above could be interesting to revisit:
A. Biryukov, D. Khovratovich, and I. Pustogarov. Deanonymisation of clients
in bitcoin p2p network. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGSAC Conference
on Computer and Communications Security, CCS ’14, pages 15–29, New York,
NY, USA, 2014. ACM.